
The new property tax revolt: No taxation without consent
California citizens have long faced challenges in combating inflation, particularly when it comes to rising property taxes. While inflation itself is largely a government failure to stabilize prices, homeowners have found ways to protect themselves from inflationary increases in property taxes. One of the most significant measures in this regard is Proposition 13.
### Proposition 13: A Shield Against Inflationary Property Taxes
Proposition 13 fixed the millage rate and capped annual increases in the assessed value of homes. Importantly, it also required voter approval for any increase in the millage rate. Since its enactment, Proposition 13 has saved California residents billions of dollars in property taxes. Its success has inspired similar initiatives in other states, becoming the gold standard for fiscal rules designed to protect homeowners from inflation-driven tax hikes.
### A New Property Tax Revolt Across the U.S.
Today, across the United States, we are witnessing a resurgence of the property tax revolt reminiscent of the movement triggered by Proposition 13 in the 1970s. With double-digit inflation rates once again placing heavy burdens on homeowners, citizens are questioning why they must bear inflationary increases in property taxes. Many ask why local governments should benefit from a windfall in property tax revenues simply because the federal government has failed to maintain stable prices.
### Lessons Learned from the First Property Tax Revolt
Since the first property tax revolt, much has been learned about effective fiscal policy. The most important lesson: fiscal rules like Proposition 13 can effectively protect homeowners from inflation-related increases in their property taxes—taxes that no one ever directly voted on.
Citizens continue to seek relief through both legislative channels and direct democracy initiatives such as referenda. However, experience shows that fiscal rules crafted solely by legislatures often fail due to the influence of special interests. By contrast, the most effective fiscal protections for homeowners have been those designed and enacted by citizens themselves through direct democratic processes.
### Models for Modern Fiscal Rules
The current wave of property tax resistance looks to Proposition 13 in California and the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) in Colorado as models. Both were designed and passed by citizens via the initiative process. With such fiscal rules in place, citizens gain the power to decide how much they are willing to pay in taxes.
In many jurisdictions, this approach has sent a clear message to elected officials: voters are rejecting tax hikes and government debt increases.
### Democrats Should Be Wary of the Redistribution Rabbit Hole
During my time on the Colorado Tax Commission, we conducted a survey of citizen attitudes toward taxation. The majority expressed the belief that governments waste much of their revenue, particularly at the national level. Many feel that government is too large, too expensive, and too intrusive in their daily lives.
This sentiment underscores the banner of the new property tax revolt: “No taxation without consent.” It should be up to citizens—not elected officials or special interests—to decide how much they are willing to pay in taxes.
If any jurisdiction wishes to increase taxes, enact new taxes, or issue debt, such decisions should require voter approval.
—
By empowering citizens and emphasizing fiscal responsibility, direct democracy initiatives like Proposition 13 and TABOR exemplify effective strategies to curb inflation-driven property tax increases and promote accountable government spending.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/3888614/no-taxation-without-consent/
You may also like
You may be interested
Globe bets on prepaid fiber, sets expansion
No content was provided to convert. Please provide the text...
Bragging rights up as Samal makes 5150 debut
A stellar Open division field will be shooting for the...
DigiPlus launches P1-M surety bond program
MANILA, Philippines — DigiPlus Interactive Corp. has partnered with Philippine...
The New York Times
- U.S. Border Patrol Arrested 81 People in Charlotte, N.C. 2025 年 11 月 17 日 Eduardo Medina and Sonia A. Rao
- Saudi Leader Looking Inward as He Comes to Washington 2025 年 11 月 17 日 Michael Ratney
- Trump Says House Republicans Should Vote to Release Epstein Files 2025 年 11 月 17 日 Ashley Ahn
- At a Shared Symbol of Jihad, the Taliban Defy Their Old Ties With Pakistan 2025 年 11 月 17 日 Mujib Mashal
- New International Student Enrollment Plummeted This Fall, Survey Finds 2025 年 11 月 17 日 Alan Blinder
- How to Not Get Kidnapped for Your Bitcoin 2025 年 11 月 17 日 David Yaffe-Bellany and Maurizio Fiorino
- How Fraudsters Use Cryptocurrency A.T.M.s to Target Victims 2025 年 11 月 17 日 Cameron Fozi, Chloe Rosenberg and Reeno Hashimoto
- The Crypto Industry’s $28 Billion in ‘Dirty Money’ 2025 年 11 月 17 日 David Yaffe-Bellany, Spencer Woodman and Sam Ellefson
- Trump Gives Legs to South Korea’s Dream for Nuclear-Powered Subs 2025 年 11 月 17 日 Choe Sang-Hun
- A Christian Answer to Trump and Trumpism Is Finally Here 2025 年 11 月 17 日 David French


Leave a Reply